Daily Mains Answer Writing Practice – 2 September 2026
Attempt first. Upload your handwritten answer. Then compare it with the model answer.
“India’s nuclear energy ambitions are no longer constrained only by technology; finance, skilled manpower, institutional capacity and public trust are equally decisive.” Discuss in the context of India’s target of 100 GW nuclear power capacity by 2047.
Official references: Department of Atomic Energy / PIB | NITI Aayog
Attempt the answer before checking the model
Model Answer
Introduction
Nuclear energy can provide India with reliable, low-carbon baseload power at a time when electricity demand is rising rapidly and the country is simultaneously pursuing energy security and net-zero goals. India has therefore set a target of 100 GW of nuclear capacity by 2047. Reaching this scale, however, requires much more than building additional reactors.
Body
Why nuclear expansion matters
- Clean firm power: Nuclear plants can supply electricity round the clock and complement variable solar and wind generation.
- Energy security: A larger domestic nuclear base can diversify India’s energy mix and reduce excessive dependence on fossil fuels.
- Industrial decarbonisation: Advanced reactors and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) can eventually support energy-intensive industries and hydrogen production.
- Strategic capability: Expansion can deepen indigenous reactor design, manufacturing, fuel-cycle and high-technology capabilities.
Why technology alone will not deliver 100 GW
- Finance: Nuclear projects require very large upfront investment and have long construction periods. Affordable long-term capital and clearer treatment of nuclear power within green-finance frameworks are therefore important.
- Skilled manpower: Rapid capacity addition will require far more nuclear engineers, technicians, safety specialists, regulators and researchers than the existing ecosystem produces.
- Manufacturing capacity: India will need a deeper domestic supply chain for heavy engineering, specialised components, fuel and project execution.
- Regulatory capacity: Faster expansion must not weaken independent safety oversight, waste management, emergency preparedness or environmental appraisal.
- Private participation: Wider participation can mobilise capital and expertise, but risk allocation, liability, tariff certainty and long-term offtake arrangements must be credible.
- Public trust: Land acquisition, rehabilitation, livelihood concerns and fears about radiation or accidents can delay projects unless communities are engaged transparently.
What India should do
- Create a predictable financing and procurement pipeline for nuclear projects.
- Expand university programmes, specialised training and industry-linked nuclear skill centres.
- Standardise reactor designs where feasible to reduce construction time and cost.
- Strengthen indigenous PHWRs while accelerating R&D and demonstration of SMRs and advanced reactors.
- Maintain strong, transparent and technically independent safety regulation.
- Build public confidence through early consultation, credible risk communication and fair rehabilitation.
Conclusion
India’s 100 GW goal is ultimately an ecosystem challenge. The country will succeed only if reactor technology is supported by affordable finance, skilled people, robust institutions, domestic manufacturing and public confidence. Nuclear power can then become not simply another source of electricity, but a dependable pillar of India’s clean-energy transition.
“The legal abolition of untouchability has not by itself dismantled the social structures that reproduce caste-based exclusion.” Discuss the persistence of caste discrimination in contemporary India and suggest measures for substantive social equality.
Attempt the answer before checking the model
Model Answer
Introduction
Article 17 abolished untouchability and the Constitution created a strong framework of equality, dignity and affirmative action. Yet caste is not merely a legal category; it is also embedded in social relations, access to resources, marriage networks, occupations and local power structures. Therefore, formal equality has not automatically produced substantive equality.
Body
Why caste-based exclusion persists
- Social reproduction: Endogamy, inherited social networks and notions of purity and hierarchy continue to reproduce caste boundaries across generations.
- Economic inequality: Unequal ownership of land, assets, education and capital reinforces older social disadvantages.
- Occupational segregation: Certain communities remain disproportionately concentrated in insecure, stigmatised or low-paying work.
- Spatial segregation: Residential separation and unequal access to common resources can persist, especially in rural areas.
- Institutional bias: Discrimination may operate indirectly in housing, employment, education and social interaction even when explicit exclusion is illegal.
- Local power relations: Where caste and political or economic dominance overlap, victims may find it difficult to report discrimination or secure timely justice.
Why constitutional and legal measures still matter
- Article 17, equality provisions and anti-discrimination laws provide an enforceable normative foundation.
- Reservations have opened access to education, public employment and political representation.
- Legal protection has enabled historically marginalised groups to assert dignity and citizenship rights.
Towards substantive social equality
- Ensure effective enforcement of anti-discrimination and atrocity laws, with accountable policing and faster justice.
- Improve access to quality schools, higher education, skilling, credit, land and entrepreneurship.
- Eliminate degrading and caste-linked occupations through mechanisation, rehabilitation and alternative livelihoods.
- Strengthen social-mixing spaces in schools, housing, workplaces and local institutions.
- Encourage inter-caste interaction and marriage while protecting individual choice.
- Use public education and community leadership to challenge everyday practices of hierarchy, not merely overt acts of untouchability.
Conclusion
The Constitution made caste discrimination legally illegitimate; society must make it socially unacceptable. India’s next step is therefore to move from formal non-discrimination to substantive equality, where dignity, opportunity and access to public life are not determined by birth.
- Did I directly address the directive used in the question?
- Did I build an argument instead of merely listing facts?
- Did I cover multiple dimensions and limitations?
- Did I use relevant examples, institutions, data or keywords?
- Did I give a practical way forward where required?
- Did I end with a balanced conclusion and stay within the word limit?
